SEAT AT THE BACK - SCRIBBLES! ~

Wednesday, 3 October 2018

FRIGHTFEST - 2018: 'LUCIFERINA' // "OTT, oversexed, drugged-up, demonic, deranged - tick, tick, tick, tick, TICK!"


LUCIFERINA

// Contains *BIG SPOILERS* in the hallucinogenic herbs . . 

WATCH BEFORE READING!! //

This was the film at this year's FRIGHTFEST that I most wanted to see. Well, OK - second only to CLIMAX  - but that's a given. It's a shame that the director (Gonzalo Calzada) couldn't make the premiere as his movie was an absolute scream.

Horror cinema can often be irritating, provoking, long-winded or deranged - but that's what keeps it fresh and exciting, and ambitious. LUCIFERINA was, at times, all of this.

It could be irritating: the climax had about 5 false starts that were all fairly lengthy, and similar. But I soon gave in. As the delirious runtime extended, and the climaxes kept coming (this Devil just wouldn't die) - I was only having a deliciously good time in there and didn't care about lunch anymore! And later, as I walked out of the cinema, I realised that - why should horror movies follow established expected formats and time schedules? It was fair play that the demon kid in LUCIFERINA (most likely the Devil himself) takes a really long time to deal with. I mean, come on - he's the Devil! He hasn't been defeated yet, ever (not even in OMEN III: THE FINAL CONFLICT, which got kinda close).

The final conflict in LUCIFERINA may have felt a little long-winded with lots of talk about how to isolate the beast and the nature of virginity as a weapon of mass destruction (yes - really!) but at least it was never boring - never less than authentically deranged. Deranged, but addictive. And relentlessly crossing those safe, protective salt lines or circles in the sand that other entries in demonic nun horror cinema are so often happy to do. Was this Argentinean director, who seems to have a Rob Zombie divisive reputation back home, actually the Gaspar 
Noé of satanic ritual flicks? You don't need to cast any runes to know my answer to that. LUCIFERINA was an absolute filthy, dirty blast to the senses and a revolting rip to the heart of restraint: this is what horror is.

The satanic ritual is thus: A young novice nun returns to her twisted family in the lush countryside after her mother's mysterious death and finds her father traumatised, painting demonic images on his bedroom walls and spending most of his time wrapped in bandages and on a ventilator. Her sister (they were both adopted) has gone all Siouxsie Sioux and has a new boyfriend with a personality bypass and knife fetish (when not trying to sexually assault his girlfriend's virginal younger sister in the family cupboard).

All the young nun's friends want to do is mock her virginity or take mystic herbs in the forest to identify the truth of what happened to these two crazy sisters when they were little girls. Clue: Think - a big bloody chunk of TO THE DEVIL A DAUGHTER and half a dozen plucked hairs of THE EXORCIST and you'll be getting close (without the need to take herbal hallucinogenics).



It's easy to be silly with a film such as LUCIFERINA
, despite the film's mirroring of the current trend for the partaking of the ayahuasca vine, or the chacruna shrub - for tourism ritualis in South America (partaken by those in search of the exposure of death). But it's a kind of nervous giggle that rises inside watching LUCIFERINA uncurl - the kind you find in a trauma unit, as a way of cleansing the air.

The film is beautifully directed, with a roaming, frantic, stylish gaze (like a hunter, with a camera) across a lush visual landscape full of hidden churches, abandoned mystics and weird statues loitering in the dense undergrowth. Nifty effects abound: gore is used sparingly and targets the eyes - but this is not a gore fest. Characters interact thanks to the film's refusal to just die and be done in the name of horror film formatting - you may even find yourself rooting for the weirdos and psychos along the way.

There's a terrific central performance from Sofia Del Tuffo as the battling young novice nun (a role with shades of Jess Franco's classic but super sleazy LOVE LETTERS OF A PORTUGUESE NUN) with supernatural sight under threat from demonic intent - full of passion and fight - and you stay on her side to the end. Also fabulous is Malena Sanchez as the twisted sister and Pedro Merlo as the boy possessed, who has to growl and spit and chant and never once come across as laughable or OTT: a cleverly quite restrained and sympathetic turn.

Demonic horrors often come across as stupid and full of boring, seen it all before, religious or demonic imagery and black mass overload, that never feels all that authentic - more of a horror by numbers for less gifted filmmakers to hide under.

Not so with LUCIFERINA. I felt the evil grow. If you love horror you should absolutely fall in love with this movie and demand it's on your Amazon wish list (other wish lists are available) right now!

Highlights of the film include a disgusting, disgraceful, demonic birth (it's all gone a bit To The Devil A Daughter again!) and a Nun Vs Devil Vs Novice threeway battle within salty candlelit circles and ruined stone walls. We also get bodies levitating or flying through the air (the demonic equivalent of a boy scout badge) and the herbal magick ritual trip in an old abandoned church comes across like THE CRAFT as directed by Fulci.


Scenes back at the family home are awash with slightly lesser - but no less depraved - wanton sexuality and ritual, orchestrated by a sinister, controlling patriarch. But the 'quietly innocent, fight-primed, second sight-loaded - and quite a bit cute - girl' Vs 'possessed, red-eyed, deep growling, spitting - and quite a bit cute - demonic boy' finale (when suddenly disrobed) is worthy of the legendary Jess Franco himself - turned up to 616. Basically, if you love cult, crazy, off-kilter, wild occult horror, you'll absolutely want to propose your love, get married and consummate to this one - all on the same night!


Probably deeply politically incorrect and morally questionable and certainly ready to offend from the start, the film is also blessed with a gorgeous soundtrack full of sombre orchestral languishing. Strange sounds come pulsing, rumbling, grumbling and lots of Latin chanting creates a sense of ominous pace and worsening restlessness. It never tires or lets up and the FRIGHTFEST 
 audience were dead quiet throughout - none of that sarcastic tittering or shuffling in seats: we sat there transfixed/ in a trance/ possessed. What we were watching felt authentically depraved, horrific and oh so wrong!

The ambitious two hour runtime never dragged and just when we thought it was all over and hadn't exploited its young leads with too much sexually depraved occult degeneration just yet - because we all knew this was a given, the finale truly went for the jugular and ended it all on a stone altar in the middle of nowhere without any clothes on - Gaspar Noé eat your heart out! Clearly virginity can - in horror cinema - be the only weapon against evil that always seems to work.

Don't see this movie unless you want to be assaulted with an overdose of the occult and the perverted, unless you want to find yourself wallowing in a luxurious landscape full of ancient abandoned ruins, unless you want to be surrounded by the stench of burning hallucinogens as you go crawling through strangling vines full of demonic birthing rituals, and unless you want to be plunged into the heart of a tropical sex magick battle to the death in a secret, and ancient, and forbidden place.

A FRIGHTFEST screening hasn't been this much fun and feather ruffling since HIDDEN IN THE WOODS or THE ROTTEN LINK. This is wild demonic horror as you always thought it could be. I loved it. And the shocked, head penetrated by horror stagger outside of the smaller (but packed out) Discovery Screen crowd when it was all over, looked way too good for a screen this small.


STUFF WE'D PUT ON THE POSTER: 

OTT, Oversexed, Drugged-Up, Demonic, Deranged - Tick, Tick, Tick, Tick, TICK!  

Has So Much Fun With The Genre That It Drags All Other Demonically Possessed Horror Flicks Featuring Satanic Nuns Into Urgent Confession  


LUCIFERINA // @ ARROW FRIGHTFEST 2018 - LONDON

REVIEWED BY MARK GORDON PALMER

Seat@TheBack

Sunday, 30 September 2018

FRIGHTFEST - 2018: 'THE DARK' // "A zombie emo love story - it will bite, suck, rip and then melt your heart . . "



THE DARK

// Contains *BIG SPOILERS* hidden in the boot of the car . .   
WATCH BEFORE READING!! //

A zombie teenage girl living alone in a patch of much-feared and avoided (by locals at least) haunted woods meets an abducted/ abused boy blinded by hate. They hide and scurry through the trees together - occasionally venturing into the darkness, but mostly staying invisible in the daylight. For they exist in an emotional dark, not in an existence that cares about light or shade, sleep or wake - or family (the worst). Snatches of music played in a decayed old bedroom in a house of horrors ravaged by years (we don't really know how many) in the middle of nowhere, or handfuls of sugary cereal spat out in disgust from the bitter taste of a zombie's taste buds, offer few moments of brief normality, and ridiculousness, to a life led on the bloodied, abandoned edge of nowhere.

One of the strangest, damn coolest, FRIGHTFEST movies ever. Featuring outstanding casting in Nadia Alexander as Mina and Toby Nichols as Alex, this is no ordinary horror movie.

Alex's ordeal at the hands of his cruel human tormentor (who we see at the start of the film driving him deeper into the woods to do, well - who knows what else to, probably for one last time) is never fully revealed. His captor forever anonymous. Possibly a stranger, maybe a family member. The calm acceptance of circumstance from this young actor is a central pin of the movie's heart-dissolving agenda. We never once have this trauma shattered with hysteria. Only when Alex faces losing his new found friend and guide - Mina - does the primal scream rise.

Mina watches the abandoned and broken boy's arrival from behind dusty windows in the house where she used to live. To survive the curse - or blessing - of returning to life, she can only exist on eating human flesh. Will Alex be next?

Nadia Alexander plays this survivor of death, abuse and improvised burial with hunched resignation and perma-poised threat; this lost and abandoned wild feral thing, tree-climbing or shadow dwelling in an abandoned home - a zombie emo with facial scars hidden under hoodie and jet black straggly hair.

As the movie progresses, Mina's wounds start to heal and the girl she once was returns from the dead and back to life for real - no longer in that state of limbo and fucked-up flux she had previously only been able to sulk and skulk and slay in. Is this the only way for a newly turned zombie to return to the living - through slow healing from a bestial state on finding a reason to live? Or is her friendship - and love - for Alex a catalyst for the scars (an allegory for self-harm?) to be faded and rid of for good?



Sound - or lack of it - is everything in THE DARK. Even the woodland is hushed. There is little dialogue. Wildlife is silent and hiding from the creature that stalks this forbidden stretch (Mina - scaring away a loudly growling police dog at one point; a challenger to the landscape of submissive quiet - enforces the idea that even the animals now fear her).

There is no birdsong, and only a little rustling of leaves. The only sound that penetrates this enclosure of monsters and ghosts - a place that creates such fear throughout the locals and all those who step within Mina's domain - is the arrival of those seeking thrills; in the most haunted of places. Or those looking to find the missing boy and the monster that took him. And is that human monster a local man (but not that local, as he still needs a map)? And is the abduction, if not the scarring, still fresh (word seems to have spread to a few workers in the woods who seem to know who the boy is)?

The truth behind the Alex's abduction is kept shrouded in mystery, but calls between Mina and someone we assume to be Alex's mother on his mobile phone - still fully charged - suggest the snatch wasn't that recent. Or does the calm, if tormented, nature of the voice at the end of the phone suggest some knowledge, resignation and even acceptance of the boy's fate? We never find out. The only backstory we follow will be Mina's.

This reveal of how Mina came to be the way she is, gets slowly uncovered to us - in thick, occasional doses of flashback. The sound escalates as she becomes a victim of her mother's violent boyfriend's desires and panic - her demise a blast of true horror (and - in contrast to much of the rest of the film - taking place off screen: sound effects carrying the weight of the shock). The girl's subsequent attacks on the mostly innocent are less bashful and she is OK to axe and bite in broad daylight - to survive or protect as required. It's not long before Alex has also tasted first blood, and even Mina finds she can be shocked by what he does.

The film comes armed with occasional quiet humour amid the isolation and life-scarring fixing of these two young friends. When Mina first discovers Alex, he gets dressed (in the clothes she brings him) in the car boot and he asks her to look away, which she does - for a moment. The sequence with the ferocious police dog being scared off by Mina's growling back is another lighter moment, as is the sequence where she her tries out the marshmallow cereal meant for Alex - if only to briefly feel like a normal teenage girl again. But there is no laughter in the cinema at all. The Discovery Screen is as hushed as the woods.

There is nothing much to laugh about - even when something potentially funny happens. We have become as isolated watching all this as the two teenagers have become in the woods. Even when alone, their past is never allowed to be forgotten, and it is (for both Mina and Alex) always with them - tightening like a noose around the neck; a loudness in the silence. Even in times when the sulkiness cracks, and some playfulness creeps in, there is always a sense of abandonment and hopelessness to bring them both back down. Their biggest - and only - hope of survival, becomes friendship.

And a rapid friendship does develop between these two - a cautious optimism allowed to creep in. At one point Mina even says to Alex that maybe, if they stay together, he could get his - "eyes fixed". Does he even know how badly his face - or Mina's - is destroyed, most likely for good? Wounds that can never be healed . .

The irony is: Mina's face is eventually 'fixed', and fixed first - her 'revival' begins when these two first meet, and is completed when they are lost to each other again. But despite being forced apart, both of them now have that chance of a better life, and you hope - perhaps need to know - that these two are never going to be apart for too long, and that even, surely, there are more adventures to be had.

I fell in love the youthful desolation and awkwardness of THE DARK. Celebrated the heart of the darkness and this meditation on friendship out of isolation that it brought. Focusing mainly on situations that seem already unfaceable - or resolutely desperate - the transformations and survival at the heart of this movie are truly inspiring (despite the use of that axe - or the eating of human flesh!). Which could be the whole point: the horror is always secondary to matters of the heart. This is not a horror film in traditional format. But like all good horror, it's also not afraid to unnerve; shock; haunt - or bite down where it hurts. When - or if - it wants to.




Within the barely rustling woodland shadows, or in the filtering through the leaves sunlight and sheltering gloom, there is a force of love, friendship and light returning to a world where the unhealable can sometimes be stitched. It's a sombre, life-affirming movie - framed by cinematography and sound design that has a life of its own (but is still generous enough to accept second billing to the ballad of Mina and Alex).

We almost feel as voyeur to witness this journey of two young outsiders finding strength in their own space within, and outside of, the boundaries of their own secretive, woodland domain. You fear for them both as they head out into the real world again - a place where bad things still happen. But it's also a step that should, in the end, make them stronger.

That idyllic life they briefly had on their own - left to their own devices - eventually seems an impossible dream (because 'others' will always eventually come, and there may be no such thing as 'absolute isolation' - even when hidden in the woods). And even more so, now they are together - death still spreads like a curse; the killings in the wood no longer just for food. Now they also both need to kill - to protect their friendship and to defend each other. But without that way of life (and by the end of the film, that way of life is all over) what else is there?

We do need another film to find out . .



One defining sequence in THE DARK comes as the two friends step beyond the trees into the world outside and there is a sudden rising of natural sound and bright light that shatters and smears the hushed, silvery and shadowy landscape they are used to - a louder and more hostile place to be in, and a bold stroke on the canvas from directors Justin P. Lange and Klemens Hufnagl. Even when ultimately left to go it alone, the strength between Mina and Alex remains. Mina's final scenes show her being picked up in a car, driven by a middle aged woman concerned that the teenage girl is out walking by herself, alone, in the middle of nowhere. Mina gets in. It's the last we see of her. The final shot of the movie . .

There's no real hint that this unknown woman's life is now at risk from the zombie girl sitting in her passenger seat. It feels more as if Mina actually now wants to be found - no longer needs to exist skulking in the shadows. Now that her face is fully returned to that of the girl she once was - no longer zombie (in appearance) - can she live a normal life again? Will she try and find her friend and help him (we have no real idea of Alex's fate)? It's an uncertain closure to the film for sure. But in a pin drop of an auditorium, and for a fully subdued FRIGHTFEST crowd, it was the closest we were going to get to a happy ending.

THE DARK comes loaded with two outstanding leads: Nadia Alexander as Mina grabs both heart and throat strings and never lets go - balancing crouching, predatory, scurrying, almost playful threat with overwhelming sadness, depression and isolation. And Toby Nichols, as Alex, elicits an eerily resigned and haunted acceptance of fate with a friendly, stoic demeanour (that occasionally slips its defences - the wetting of his jeans more symbolic of actual terror than an often outward calm suggests). Direction, sound (James Lazarenko - sound mixer) and cinematography (from co-director Klemens Hufnagl) - and yes: screenplay too (from director Lange) - is elegiac, naturalistic and quietly breathless.


THE DARK was a standout at this year's FRIGHTFEST: an ultra dark and super moody tale of an emo zombie in love. That fantasy, angsty, teenage tree-climbing zombie in the woods graphic novel that you always wanted to see made as a movie - just got done.

The lack of fanfare compared to some other movies on the main screen this year was admitted in the film's introduction from the FRIGHTFEST team. But the sleeper hit potential and word of mouth the film has been getting, was also acknowledged. No cast or crew attended the screening, which was a shame. The gathering aura surrounding this movie and its quirky and defiantly individual existence in the midst of other movies making far more noise and chaos (not least Noé's closing whack to the head of CLIMAX) was a hushed breath of freshly dead girl's air in the auditorium, and just a little bit awesome.


STUFF WE'D PUT ON THE POSTER: 

A Bloodthirsty Walk In The Woods With A Shuttered-Up Dead Girl And Her New BFF  

Blood And Guts - Out Of The High School And Into The Woods  

A Sulky, Broody, Woodland Horror Full Of Zombie Angst And Teenage Abandonment  

Your Favourite "Lost Zombie Girl Falls In Love With A Mutilated Cute Boy In The Woods" Graphic Novel Made Flesh And Blood!

A Zombie Emo Love Story - It Will Bite, Suck, Rip And Then Melt Your Heart  



THE DARK // ARROW FRIGHTFEST 2018

REVIEWED BY MARK GORDON PALMER

Seat@TheBack

Monday, 20 June 2016

BOMBA, THE JUNGLE BOY (1949) // In which Bomba is smitten, Peggy Ann Garner smoulders and the stock footage shocks!

                      

* Plot spoilers and skimpy loincloths ahead - watch before reading! *

The best screen Tarzan  has always been, for me, the legendary Johnny Weissmuller - star of numerous jungle adventures featuring the Edgar Rice Burroughs-penned, vine-swinging hero. It's a close run thing as I also greatly  admire the late 60's borderline 'bit trashy' but all round fun guy and gaudily colourful small screen  hero - Ron Ely (always a bit too sweaty - or rubbed on-oily, but that's what this new thing called colour TV does to you!).

Ely was a Tarzan who always looked more like the geezer bloke who lives next door to you, come over to fix your dad's car (in a loincloth from the local joke shop) than proper Tarzan, but he was still really knowledgeable and cool - at least through a child's eyes!


RON ELY - HE CAN FIX YOUR FAN BELT!  


Weissmuller was kind of a real life Tarzan though - an Olympic champion swimmer, he proved an athletic and endearing jungle man and wore the loincloth that god gave him as naturally as a baby wears a nappy; he also did not ever fix your dad's car. He jumped on top of - and wrestled - crocs instead, and chatted up a nearly naked Jane. He also looked like he didn't want to be your friend and far preferred cuddling up to wild animals with big trunks, if not making a treehouse for his jungle mate (the girl lost in jungle kind - not the best mate down t'pub kind that Ely would have taken!). Yes - Weissmuller was proper Tarzan.

The life and times of Johnny Weissmuller may not have been perfect, and he may have craved or been seduced by success too greatly for comfort (he divorced his first wife on the instruction of MGM - to appeal more to the girls that adored his new sexier take on the Tarzan character) but he was never less than convincing when swinging through the trees with his trademark Tarzan yodel and chimp hanging off his shoulders.








In the second Tarzan movie, Tarzan and his Mate (1934) that was just about still pre-Hays Code (which means we got all the naughtier stuff before the powers that wanted to be, and censor film across states, became more enforcing) we even had newly arrived girl about jungle - Jane (Maureen O' Sullivan - doubled by Olympic swimmer Josephine McKim) swimming with Tarzan . . in the nude! Oh yes - believe it! Those black  & white pictures may seem tame to modern cinema-goers, but back in the day there was all manner of titillation on display.

Of course the nude Jane scenes were eventually cut  after protest from religious groups and in the climate of good taste creeping in across the US states able to make their own decisions on censorship at the time, and only later found and restored to the film at the turn of the century - but at least the extra scenes were never destroyed, as so much snipped material at the time often was.



Eventually MGM decided that Tarzan didn't just need a mate - he needed a boy too. Being the now far more restrictive era of film-making (or rather - film screening)  by that point (in which Jane had to now wear far less revealing outfits and a more decent 'one-piece') Tarzan didn't get to 'make' baby. He adopted. And so - 'Boy' (great choice of name!) was born. And he was played by a young Johnny Sheffield in the film Tarzan Finds a Son! (1939) and in subsequent sequels (the best of which being the quite deranged - Tarzan's Desert Mystery, in 1943).

LIKE FATHER, LIKE . .

Eventually the film studio decided that Boy had grown a bit too big for his boots, and certainly his loincloth, and he was sent away to school - in England. Hurrah! Now that would have made a great film saga . .

The Tarzan movies had already became increasingly fantastical (brilliantly so - Nazis, giant spiders and mermaids all making cameos) but all good swingers have their day, and Tarzan had also had his. Without Boy or even Jane to perk him up (even MGM had quit and handed the films over to RKO) life up in the trees was a little bit duller for Tarzan, and within a few years Johnny Weissmuller was given his swimming orders. The actor swam across to another film studio (Columbia) to make more Tarzan-like films as rugged wild animal tracker and fully-clothed hero Jungle Jim (1948 - 1954) that finished its life as a TV series (1955/56).

APE WITH ROCK, WAITS FOR CUE . .




'Boy' got his own series as well: twelve features within six years as 'Bomba' - teenager of the jungle. It proved to be his final bow in acting, or at the very least - his final swing.





While Weissmuller had ended up post-Tarzan at Columbia and Cheeta the chimp had started work on his autobiography, poor Johnny ended up down 'Poverty Row' - at Monarch Films (one of the super-low budget action movie studios of the day) which meant that 1949's Bomba the Jungle Boy, the first film in the new showcase film series for Sheffield, was shot on a jungle-dressed studio backlot and had a whole film reel's worth of stock jungle footage shoved up its trunk to boost (not entirely unsuccessfully - making stock footage insertion something of a minor artform here) the exotic jungle boy vibe.





The script from Jack DeWitt (later best known for the Richard Harris ritualistic, sympathetic Sioux classic - A Man Called Horse from 1970, and a couple of sequels) isn't terrific, but does the job. It all starts off with a father and daughter-led photography team travelling on location to Africa (which is more than Monarch Films allowed Bomba!) to shoot (with a camera - not a shotgun, although . .) the exotic local wildlife.

Meet the supporting players: there's intrepid, and slightly devious, grumpy old dad - George Harland (played by horror regular Onslow Stevens from the pleasingly ghastly delights of  House of Dracula, The Creeper and giant ant-terror - Them!) and his even pluckier, fiery but doe-eyed daughter Pat (Peggy Ann Garner who had already been praised at a very young age for such films as Jane Eyre and A Tree Grows in Brooklyn).




JANE EYRE (1943)


Father and daughter are shown around the parts of the jungle that other tourists can't reach by a resident glorified 'Scottish' gamekeeper (well, with an accent like that . . !) called Andy (played by Irish supporting player Charles Irwin who had numerous 'uncredited' roles in famous movies from 'Tin Polisher' in The Wizard of Oz to 'Cardiff Police Constable' in Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man ). And then there's enigmatic character actor Smoki Witfield on board as the resourceful and loyal local chap - Eli (and like Andy, our favourite 'Scottish' gamekeeper - a recurring role in the Bomba films).

Pat gets lost in the jungle while chasing wildlife, but never looks all that scared, in fact quiet Pat soon turns into a plucky and brave, lagoon-swimming, dress-shedding, b-movie adventuress by the time the tribal drumbeat of the end credits kicks in. Pat, even before meeting up with Bomba, has already tried her best to persuade dad to let her join him in capturing those ever more dangerous-to-shoot photographs of wild beasts (that they spend most of the film looking for - in ever increasing circles around the well-dressed studio backlot).




Dad is bored of all the usual kind of wild jungle beasts they encounter on their shoots (on that old familiar stock footage - and who can blame him?) and wants to capture something really unusual. He also doesn't want his daughter going with him into any properly dangerous places - like the mysterious faraway matte painting of her father's favourite rocky (and completely forbidden to all teenage daughters) danger zone seen on the distant horizon where great danger may lurk (or just 'Boy' from the Tarzan movies).


Of course, his daughter goes walkabout, nearly gets eaten alive by a stuffed leopard, is saved by a boy in a loincloth who fights and kills the stuffed leopard and then runs off after she tries to shoot him. It's not long before she also ends up in the forbidden zone that Daddy forbade her to go near as well (Sigmund Freud - take note!). Her punishment: a swarm of killer locusts. Ok, say what you like about this film and its scathingly low budget, but it sure is a heady trip when it wants to be!

Tarzan love Jane - Bomba love all girls!


Luckily for everyone, especially those still missing Boy from the old Tarzan films, Pat is soon rescued by Bomba the Ape Teen, who - luckily for her - is about the same age (if dressed in less clothing). Pat, in a violent rage of symbolic teenage hormonal angst, tries to shoot Bomba when he gets too close.



To make up for this unfriendly welcome (in yet another rage of symbolic teenage hormonal angst) she later decides to take off all her clothes behind a nearby bush. Bomba watches with interest - he's already nobly offered the girl his only loincloth and been rejected. Pat then changes into the handy and rather fetching Jungle Jane bikini kit that Bomba has made - for just such an occasion as this. Not surprisingly, it's a perfect fit and Bomba saves the day! The End. Oh hang on - that's not the end . .




In a rush of even more symbolic, but middle-aged, testosterone-fuelled paternal rage, when nice boy Bomba goes and tells the half-dressed girl's father that he has 'rescued his daughter' and is keeping her safe 'in his treehouse' - daddy shoots Bomba as payback (and this time doesn't miss).


With the odd savage lion attack to come (or more like a native tribe's attack on a poor defenceless lion as part of a crop-saving ritual - this film is clearly not vegan-friendly) as well as the aforementioned deadly locust swarm (and that's about it for the action stuff) we have to get our thrills more from Pat and Bomba taking a swim in the river together (but unlike the original Weissmuller/ O'Sullivan 'Tarzan and Jane' swim - everyone keeps their loincloths on this time). 'Bomba the Jungle Boy' keeps it simple on a limited budget and doesn't do much to raise the stakes, but it does try to get some decent momentum going, when it can afford to.

And if you were a teenage groupie of Tarzan-type movies back in the day - then Boy sure has grown up since playing chase with Cheeta in the treehouse while Tarzan 'make love - not war' with Jane in the lagoon, and there was probably some curiosity factor at the time in seeing what the former child star was up to these days. And these days, Boy's in love! It's all very innocent love and entirely unchallenging stuff of course, but still ridiculously endearing somehow and well-played by Sheffield and Peggy Ann Morgan.





I wonder if Sheffield made for a worthy, if a bit bric-a-brac, pin-up for bedroom walls across America before James Dean came along and did Rebel Without a Cause in 1955 and cool quiffs replaced crappy loincloths. Bomba doesn't have any annoying parents to bug with his bad behaviour but he does run wild on his own, and is a confirmed loner. He's always a bit too well-behaved, if a bit prone to sulking, to be a genuine rebel though, but does still make a stand for rebellion against untrustworthy adults, attacks the hunter and protects their prey, and when offered the chance to return to civilization at the end of Bomba, the Jungle Boy - he refuses.




And here lies the main theme at the heart of this film, above all the lion and locus attacks: will moody teenager Pat stay in the jungle with Bomba and become the next Maureen O'Sullivan? Will Bomba go to New York and become king of the urban jungle? Will there be another Bomba movie? Well, the answer was yes to more Bomba films as this one had been a huge success. The other exciting plot spoiler (what Pat does) I will let you find out for yourself . .




It's easy to gently mock a film clearly designed for a more youthful audience than the grown-up Tarzans were. The Bomba films were the Twilight vampire flicks of the jungle film world and Johnny Sheffield the Robert Pattinson of his day (I'm just guessing this really: is it more likely that young filmgoers at the time, like many critics of these films today, also thought Bomba was a little bit second rate to the big budget Tarzans; a bit too worthy and the lead  now dressed in a bit too big a loincloth to care?).

"I like you Bomba, but I'd rather be saved by Tarzan!"

As directed by veteran action and TV serial director Ford Beebe (Buck Rogers/ Flash Gordon/ The Green Hornet) this Bomba debut always moves along at a brisk pace, but it is a bit too talky for its own good. The chatter is broken up by being blended with huge chunks of stock location footage, although the end result is far more seamless than you may expect - in fact, while not being entirely convincing, and occasionally not at all convincing, it's still pretty neat that the stock footage doesn't kill the film outright but keeps it holding on for dear life when there's barely a decent plot to cling on to.


The script vine being swung on here is well and truly greased with long spells of aimless chatter and the actors have to work their safari hats (or loincloths) off to get to the good stuff (or at least a bit better stuff). The editors on this movie (Roy Livingston and Otho Lovering) also deserve a medal, if not an Oscar - the film's dramatic finale, in which the main cast watch a lion hunt and are surrounded by a whole pack of the wild beasties out to eat them alive, relies almost entirely on stock footage for its kicks.

This stock footage occasionally may appear rather dubious to a modern day audience, especially one lingered-on killing of a lion by tribal leaders that can make for uncomfortable viewing. But this scratchy footage is seemingly filmed by documentary makers at the time and from some respectful distance and not (as far as it's possible to tell) for the purposes of entertainment (unlike the kind of self-shot footage some Italian zombie filmmakers in the 70s especially, allowed - resulting in an often increasing burdening of guilt in the years ahead, as public consciousness changed and grew increasingly outraged).  


WHERE'S BOMBA WHEN YOU NEED HIM?
'CANNIBAL HOLOCAUST' SHOCKS IN 1980 . .
The Bomba films often have our hero protecting wildlife and appearing devastated when he has to kill another animal to protect the stupid tourists from certain death. In Safari Drums (1953) Bomba has to kill a lion to stop it suffering further, after a member of a visiting film crew deliberately shoots it, mortally wounding the King of the Jungle.




Bomba reveals how the animals all listen to him and respect him - even converse with him, but now he will be their prey as he has killed one of their own. When Bomba says that: 'Remember - if you kill one of them, the rest will trample you to death',  it's hard not to feel a slight shiver shooting down your spine! The film's finale lingers on a real fight between a lion and a tiger, and far more consciously exploits animals for our entertainment than anything seen in Bomba the Jungle Boy.




Some other startling wildlife footage edited into Jungle Drums was originally used memorably in the first Bomba: a lion creeps up on a warthog (I've been told, although to me it looks more like some creature out of Doctor Who - I mean, what the hell is that thing?) minding its own business and then plucks it out of its resting hole in the ground like it's a person-sized, newly-shaven rag doll. It's astounding, even quite upsetting footage, and stays in the mind long after the film has finished. But that's the reality of nature and the wild: often naturally raw and brutal when played as a code of survival.

EASY TIGER! 



The supporting cast in Bomba, the Jungle Boy are especially effective, despite few lines of much worth to work with. Onslow Stevens as Pat's caring but oppressive father and Charles Irwin as their friendly guide and gamekeeper (and warner of imminent stock footage danger) are often a joy to watch: exchanging dire warnings and thinly-veiled threats to each other to do things 'my way - or not at all'! The sparky patter does get a bit repetitive and isn't consistently endearing, if only because there's so bloody much of it - the cast do their best.



Sheffield as Bomba is striking of body frame and really looks the part. Ok, his hair may be a little too heavily blowdried to entirely convince as a wild child of the jungle but his toned muscles will still cause certain bulge envy or appreciation in watching males sunk on a sofa worrying about their waistline and the lord of the chattering chimp's hesitant words of jungle wisdom are endearingly coy and refreshingly self-conscious.

Sheffield's accent here veers between that of a shy young New Yorker lost on a low budget film backlot and a feisty jungle man putting on his best baritone for the Jungle Janes in the audience: it's a strange combination and in later films he drops the hesitant Tarzan-style monotone yap. But this is a star turn, and Sheffield  probably knows it - you can imagine all the girls sittng with their families at the original theatrical screenings going all weak at the knees, and others of all ages and all persuasions feeling much the same way, but with less of a fanfare back in the days of the Hays Code restricting all minds of most impure thoughts!





There's a lot of humour to be had between Bomba and Pat, especially the now rather infamous scene where Pat tears her nice (but entirely impractical) dress strolling around Bomba's jungle hideout that teasingly reveals the top of her stockings. Bomba offers his loincloth and starts to untie it (they're saying bum di di bum di di bum bum bum) then brings Pat the perfectly stitched leopard print dress that he keeps out back (one would feel so much safer with a strong, fearless man beside one). Jane goes behind the hut to change, throwing her underwear to the nearby chimps as she does - who all get to try on her knickers (I wonder if we'll ever get to seven?).


And if you are wondering about all those random quotes scattered around just now - it's my tribute to 1970's Carry on Up the Jungle (with Terry Scott as a plumper than your average Tarzan star) that this Bomba sequence reminded me of, and way before Terry's time in the loincloth!

BOMBA & PAT
 
UGH & JUNE 

It's pretty racy, this first ever Bomba movie, for the time. You can almost imagine the filmmakers sniggering off camera. Peggy Ann Garner who plays Pat, was well known to filmgoers as an enigmatic former child star (she was only 13 when she starred in her most famous film - A Tree Grows in Brooklyn, in 1945) and her mildly saucy jungle antics in Bomba a few years later may have raised a few eyebrows at the time, if only because her previous work had been far more serious and startling than appearing in a (very) b-movie jungle actioner with another former child star beside her.






And Peggy Ann steals the show with her seething need to rebel and escape her mundane life (if being an exotic wildlife photographer travelling around the world can ever be called 'mundane'!). There's some real moral dilemma-raising in Pat's uncertainty at the end of the movie as to whether to stay with Bomba lost in the jungle and leave her father - forever wondering what became of her.


Clearly Pat wants a life alone with Bomba, and the boy himself also clearly believes there's enough space for her back in his hut (maybe they could even adopt a baby one day - just like Tarzan did with 'Boy'!) or should she go back home to America to help with her father's rather naive idea to 'make a fortune' with slow-mo film footage of animals which he decides schools: 'will pay a fortune for'. Ah - bless his cotton socks! (Cue: lots of footage of animals jumping through the jungle like hairy ballerinas in slow-mo to prove how amazing this footage could be. And I do mean lots . .)


The young actress imbues her character with steely-eyed, butter wouldn't melt, (but could bubble and flame if you don't watch out) charisma. Bomba is smitten. As he waits to find out whether Pat will stay in or leave the jungle in the film's final moments, there's real edginess and impending fear of regret shining through his brooding gaze as an over-protective father tries to tilt the balance.


Peggy Ann Garner's career never really topped her iconic performances in favourites like A Tree Grows in Brooklyn or Jane Eyre and soon shifted into mostly TV work after her Bomba role, and she died young - at 52 - of cancer.


After the Bomba films reached the end of their jungle road in 1945, Johnny Sheffield tossed his loincloth into the flames of the past and never acted again. He's still far better remembered as Tarzan's playful, mischievous - but fiercely loyal - 'Boy', but Bomba was his chance at a starring role, and even though he is still upstaged at times in his debut by a pretty girl ripping her dress and a whole load of stock footage, without Johnny there would have been no Bomba. And without Bomba there'd be no more use for stock footage of lions being chased by tribal leaders in the long grass. Instead, that footage will have, by now, rotted away.

The Bomba books were written by a team of writers (the same team that gave us the Hardy Boys and Nancy Drew) called the Stratemeyer Syndicate (created and initially written mainly by Edward Stratemeyer) under the pseudonym of Roy Rockwood. These stories fired the imagination of younger readers and later spawned a series of comic books as well as the films.




In older age, Johnny Sheffield, pruning a tree at home in California, slipped and fell - in 2010. The fall wasn't thought serious at first, but it triggered a fatal heart attack and he died aged 79. The irony of Sheffield, the former 'Boy' and 'Bomba' of the jungle, being up a tree when he lost his footing (something he never did on camera) probably wasn't lost on anyone. The accident was a tragic end card to have for such a well-loved child star and who was a continually warm and generous recipient of fan adoration throughout his life - talking and writing about those jungle epics of the past with huge affection.

Johnny Sheffield never really hit the big time, second playing to a tall man in a loincloth, a skinny-dipping Jane, or random - but thrilling, to audiences of the day - stock wildlife footage. A pilot for a new TV series created for him by his father that was to be called 'Bantu the Zebra Boy' only reached pilot stage. Sheffield's career in the movies was over.


LOOK - ZEBRA PRINT LOINCLOTH!


Johnny Sheffield remained, as close contemporary James Dean would remain too - a forever youthful genre icon in cinema history (Johnny just a bit less famous than some of the others!). This was an actor who had spent most of his career swinging aimlessly and joyously through the trees, saving - and then chatting up - lost American girls in danger in the deepest jungle without ever so much as a farewell kiss in thanks, or forever having a bloody scene-stealing chimp swinging around his neck in just about every damn film he appeared in: respect is due!

Bomba's two year bask in the b-row spotlight was relatively brief but still full of broody, sulky, jungle angst and charm. And he was certainly a decent enough rival, if not quite to Tarzan, then certainly to Jungle Jim . .












WORDS: MARK GORDON PALMER